Neobanks and RWAs will be the bubble of the next cycle. These consumer fintech app, due to branding power, think they can get away without PoR (see crypto[.]com)
They will race to the bottom with each taking increasing risks.
Another Difficult Personal Decision
We’ve made the difficult personal decision…to stay miles away from every FAKE stablecoins out there and continue trading on @HyperliquidX, where we can literally reverse exposure in minutes with minimal market impact. 🤣
Not because @PacmanBlur, @SmokeyTheBera, or @pauliepunt’s ex–best friend 🤣have been calling this BS out — but because if most of your assets sit off-chain, you should NOT be called a stablecoin, and you definitely shouldn’t be looping leverage on top of something that is illiquid by definition.
@pythianism called it “RWA looping” (conveniently aligned with @hiFramework’s latest investments — we understand it’s easy to sell LPs on a pivot to AI infra during AI-mania kek), but if Buffett called derivatives WMD back in 2008, then looping on illiquid assets with dubious transparency and spreads that clearly can’t outlast on-chain borrow costs is just the tokenized version of WMD.
⸻
Why D2 Doesn’t Touch That Stuff
At D2, we made very conservative design choices since December 2023, and we never marketed our stablecoin-deposit strategy as a “stablecoin.”
Even without a single down epoch (yet 🙏💚), calling it that would have been misleading — that’s exactly why we named it ETH++ and now HYPE++, so users wouldn’t get confused.
Our triple-audited architecture guarantees that all users can withdraw at the same time, under the same conditions, during the withdrawal/deposit window:
This is why even @StreamDefi could withdraw their entire position in one transaction without affecting any other user.
(Receipts attached 👇)
And — broken clock or not, right twice a day 🤣 — Caleb invested in both d2HYPE and HYPE++, and made money in both.
⸻
With the Premise (as @GearboxProtocol correctly pointed out) That Looping is Broken…Curious to See How Others Try to Fix It
I’m genuinely curious how
@sonyasunkim, @3f_romeo, @3FLabs @MikeIppolito_
try to solve this fundamental mismatch, as they discussed on @thebellcurvepod:
But when your last hedge-fund employer is — the largest private lender in Asia with $50B AUM — forgive us for being skeptical that it’s “good” to tokenize and loop leverage on private credit, or anything with the liquidity profile of private credit.
Private credit is a lawyers-and-paranoid-people game.
You negotiate covenants line-by-line, and you need a very specific skillset — the one my ex-colleagues at had.
That skillset is nothing like what Vance learned at Framework. Sorry, mate. VC is a home-run business.Private credit is precision-risk management.
And definitely completely different than the ‘skill set’ @Re7Labs @MEVCapital @hyperithm @TelosConsilium showed ( or lack of, kek)
⸻
And One Last Funny Note…
Sonia referenced @FasanaraDigital MF1as an example of illiquid private credit ( we like the flowcharts 💚)
The stablecoin that Stream Finance used to repay the loan against MF1?
It came from their withdrawal of HYPE++ in one transaction, without any impact on other users.
So to anyone exposed to @StreamDefi: you’re welcome. 💚
Hyperliquid

3,167
1
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。


